Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

êáöÍæêÀÇ öÍÊàÍöÐÀ¿¡ μÇÑ ÷ÖͪùÊîÜ æÚϼ

THE STATISTICAL STUDY OF INTERDENTAL SPACE IN THE PRIMARY DENTBTION

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1980³â 7±Ç 1È£ p.53 ~ 61
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°íõ¼®(ÍÔô¸à¸)/Chun Suk Ko

Abstract

'S'㼿¡ ËÜñ¬ÇÏ´Â 2ᨿ¡¼­ 6ᨱîÁöÀÇ ä®ÔÛ 205Ù£(Ñû 114, åü 91)À» ÓßßÚÀ¸·Î RavnÀÇ ö´ïÒ
Û°Ûö¿¡ ëîÇØ êáöÍæêÀÇ öÍÊàÍöÐÀÀ» ÷ÖͪùÊîÜÀ¸·Î ðàÞÛ,æÚϼÇÑ Ì¿Íý ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿ÒÕÀ» ¾ò¾ú
´Ù.
1. öÍÊàÍöÐÀÀÇ ÞºÓø´Â ß¾äÉ¿¡¼­ êáö°ï·öÍ¿Í êá̳öÍÊàÀÌ, ù»äÉ¿¡¼­ êá̳öÍ¿Í ð¯1êáÏ¿öÍÊàÀÌ
°¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç .ß¾, ù»äÉ ¸ðµÎ êáÏ¿öÍÊàÀÌ °¡Àå ³·¾Ò´Ù.
2. öÍÊàÍöÐÀÀÇ ðú׾ܬ ÞºÓø´Â ß¾, ù»äÉ ÍìÀÌ çÏíþÍöÐÀ°ú ÇÔ²² öâÝ»êÈ¿¡ ÍöÐÀÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ÌÑéç°¡
°¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ÍöÐÀÀÇ ïïÓø´Â ß¾, ù»äÉ ¸ðµÎ S2ÀÎ ÌÑéç°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
3. çÏíþÍöÐÀÀÇ ÞºÓø´Â ß¾äÉÀÌ ù»äɺ¸´Ù ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ß¾, ù»äÉ ÍìÈ÷ å»ö°àõÀÎ ÌÑéç°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
4. êóÐÀúþ öÍæêÏâÀÌ øÍáðÏâ öÍæêúþº¸´Ù ÞºÓø°¡ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç øÍáðúþ öÍæêÏâñé å³1/2 ïïÓø¿¡¼­
crowdingÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
5. êóéÄÍöÐÀÀÇ Å©±â¿¡¼­ ÷Ýßí´Â ß¾,ù»äÉ ÍìÈ÷ ï·öÍÝ», ̳öÍÝ», êáÏ¿öÍæï â÷À̾úÀ¸¸ç àõܬ,
äÉܬ ó¬×ä´Â ìãïÒµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to statistically evaluate the spacing of primary dentition
according to whether or not a space existed and measurement of amount of space in
205 children (male 114, female 91) from 2 to 6 years of age.
The results were as fellows;
1. In the incidence of interdental space on each region, spacing between the primary
lateral incisors and primary canine in maxilla and between the primary canine and 1st
primary molar in mandible showed the highest percentage, on the other hand, spacing
between the 1st and 2nd primary polars in both jaw showed the lowest percentage.
2. In the kinds of interdental space, the state of primate space and other space together
showed the highest percentage, and in the degree of spacing, S2 showed
the highest percentage in both jaw.
3. In the incidence of primate space, maxillary primate space showed higher percentage
than mandibular primate space in bilateral case.
4. In the type of arch form, spaced arch showed higher percentage than closed arch
and about the haw of closed arch showed crowding.
5. In both Jaw, available space showed incisor segments, canine segments, and
premolar segment in order of amount, and there were not statistically significant
differences of sex or jaws in the amount of available space.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI